Fighters >:/

[sh4d0wkid]

Yes I know there are other stone allocaation posts but... this one is a rant. :D

I dont understand this ;_;
48 Fighter - 201-101 hp/sp stones
54 mage - 55/85 hp/sp stones

If fighters have so much sp stones why cant we have more hp stones..?? They can do reg attacks we cant unless ur a pure str with a bunch of godly str mayb =/

[Farashimisanoob]

Fighters need moar HP/SP stones? NO WAI! They don't really

[sh4d0wkid]

Eric o.o I never see u on anymore D: I understand HP but SP compared to a mage???

[drigr_x]

Isn't this the same thing as what's happening on the other stone thread though? It turned more into a huge battle of the classes.

[sh4d0wkid]

Sorry if I feel Mage's are being disadvantaged =/ Pure str fighters t starting to take mages DD spot away =/ And they have hell alot of stones =/

[drigr_x]

I was just pointing out that there is already a thread open that is doing the same thing as this. And you shouldn't have opened a new thread since the other one isn't even off the first page in the thread selection.

[sh4d0wkid]

Did u read what my post even said..??? I know tht alrdy =/ And ur talking about how it's making ana rugeuemnt when ur starting them ;_;

[drigr_x]

I did read the first post. You're using it as a rant. But people have been ranting in the Ston Allocation thread since it opened. _·_

[sh4d0wkid]

Okey??? I care y...?? Mayb I want my own rant =/

[damon101]

i think they dont need more...
this should be like this...

CLASS= HP/SP(STONES)= at max lvl you get this amount of stones

at lvl 1 you start with
FIGTHERS= 20hp/10sp
CLERICS= 12hp/18sp
ARCHERS= 18hp/12sp
MAGES= 10hp/20sp

from lvl 1 to 30 you win 5 stones each 3 lvls
FIGTHERS= 4hp/1sp
CLERICS= 2hp/3sp
ARCHERS= 3hp/2sp
MAGES= 1hp/4sp

from lvl 31 to 60 you win 7 stones each 3 lvls
FIGTHERS= 5hp/2sp
CLERICS= 3hp/4sp
ARCHERS= 4hp/3sp
MAGES= 2hp/5sp

from lvl 61 to 90 you win 7 stones each 3 lvls
FIGTHERS= 6hp/3sp
CLERICS= 4hp/5sp
ARCHERS= 5hp/4sp
MAGES= 3hp/6sp

from lvl 91 to 120 you win 7 stones each 3 lvls
FIGTHERS= 7hp/4sp
CLERICS= 5hp/6sp
ARCHERS= 6hp/4sp
MAGES= 4hp/7sp

from lvl 121 to 150 you win 7 stones each 3 lvls
FIGTHERS= 8hp/5sp
CLERICS= 6hp/7sp
ARCHERS= 7hp/6sp
MAGES= 5hp/8sp

[sh4d0wkid]

I dont think thats true O_o my fighters hp/sp is 2/1 and mage is like 1/3

[drigr_x]

Hmm... Why not just say lvl 31 - 150 as 7 per 3 lvls? or did you make a typo?

[Bob_Biscuit]

CLERICS= 12hp/18sp

from lvl 1 to 30 you win 5 stones each 3 lvls
CLERICS= 2hp/3sp

(Total of 32HP/38SP)

from lvl 31 to 60 you win 7 stones each 3 lvls
CLERICS= 3hp/4sp

(Total of 62HP/78SP)

Umm... At 63, I have 189 HP and 227 SP. I think your math's a little off.

Clerics have an insane amount of stones. Mages have a very small amount of stones. This is by Ons On Soft's design. Why they made it that way, we can only guess, but frankly, complaining about it won't change much. Maybe put something in feedback asking the GMs if they'd try to negotiate with Ons On Soft and give you guys more stones. They may not post there often, but I'm certain they at least read it over before asking Ons On Soft for certain features.

[Cloud-Strife1984]

Fighter and Cleric have lot of stones and mage sorry my mage is 80 i become all 3 levels 1 stones more not good Outspark^^

[Bob_Biscuit]

Fighter and Cleric have lot of stones and mage sorry my mage is 80 i become all 3 levels 1 stones more not good Outspark^^

You're blaming the wrong people. Ons On Soft is the tyrant company of Fiesta, Outspark merely has its permission to provide us with an English version.

[TwistedFreak]

yeah mages have less stones, bt mages are normally party goes with generally a cleric due to the skills they get that a side just think of this your saving a hell of alot of money having less stones, my fighter has over 300hp and about 150sp and when i spent an hour in lvl 6x abyss (b4 i lvld) i used most of them (down to like 30hp/10sp) and hp stones being about 2-300c each it cost alot of money to restone generally close to 100s each time i restone after a massive long grind.

in the end you just have to go with it and know there is pros and cons to having more/less and having more is not always better

[Poisoned77]

Please restrict your thoughts and opinions on stone allocation the existing and very active thread in GD. That way we can prevent repetitive arguments from spilling over into other forums.

[CLOSED]