Why Fighters r on the top?

[datgirl621]

Why are fighters on the top? they have the most weapons, even better weapons then the others. Better Skills. Even better clothes. They have everything. Its crazy! Why cant clerics get better skills? why cant mages get better def? why cant archers be taller ? But even though fighters got everything they're also the smexest chars ever!:D I mean the SMEXIEST!:D Like my fighter.
well my point is the others need more things too.

[chidoriattacker]

XD u know thts kinda all true XD fighters r on the top and we the rest r on the bottom of the food chain lol and clerics r next to u guys D: but anyway ima proud mage :D and wen im in my 70s ima get a fihgter to like lvl 50 or so :p may b further

[jaxman13]

Fighters r the smexiest:) anyways i dont see why fighters need 3 weps if fighters get 3 weps everyone else should as well. I think the way the armour looks is okay since its merely oppinion. I think that as far as skills go everythings fair but clerics should get atleast 1 AoE even if its a very weak move. umm about archers being short, thats life deal with it lol
________________________
TEVA: Fighter Rolance 5x

[SpartanHero]

Idk...
I have a high lvl fighter 6x ^_^, and i would Give all my equips and money to have him changed to mage, Because i have more fun with mages, Fighters arnt the best
There is no, "best class"
There really isnt any changes that need to be made, except mabe lvling get easier ^^
Recently my friend was given a high lvl mage, Im so jealous :O

[gregysuper]

Archers have best cloths...
If they give mages more def and they make us taller then we'll totaly SUCK
We need more skills...

[soojin]

oh, that's the kind of on top you meant.

lmao @ " why can't archers be taller ". aren't they elves or some kind of forest nymphs / sprites ? haha~ i wish my paladiny was short like my archer. it's cute.

and i think warrior girls have cute outfits.

[gregysuper]

but archers girls have mini-shirts...
whats smexiest than that?

[zhenshi]

but archers girls have mini-shirts...
whats smexiest than that?

Lmao and some mages female equips are like what? panties?....I think female are hot, but male fighters, like myself, are RAWR!!!!

P.S.
This is not bragging, why? COZ ITS TRUE!!! tuturu....

[schbabaggo]

I beg to differ... look at the lvl 50 sword+shield, together with the armor ;_; not looking forward at all to getting there

[GoldenWidow]

Because we were designed to be the 'hero' of the game.

It isn't fair, we're broken, we're overpowered, we have no weaknesses whatsoever. Low magic defense? Use a shield. Low aim? Use a 1h sword, with the shield. No ranged attacks? Don't need them, use Devastate when you're close enough. We have no weaknesses, we have the highest defense, HP and physical strength. Our armor has the highest base defense aswell.

We were designed, as the hero.

Clerics were designed, to heal.

Mages were designed, to damage deal.

Archers were designed, to DOT.

Basic, simple, math. It will never change, no matter how many people in other classes post threads about 'its lyk nut fair u guyzsers!!1one' it will not change, ever.

[dakneez]

fighters ftw ^.^

[spart5]

Ya um the thing about the fighters having everything.. the clers can heal rev,invincible and others and there def is right next to a fighters, a mage has powerful attacks but even though they dont have enough def they make up for it with there sheer m power,
archers can poison..POISON somthing clers dont need to worry but other classes do since he is practicaly doing 2 atks at the same time and they can shoot faster than any class can with a bow. And fighters have there str and def but they dont have any backup skills for poison,periodic bleed(trip and bleed) and they are very slow when they get hit with ice. so fighters are not the best.......................Oya and lv 50 fighter armour is a guy wearing a strechting braw with straps to his SHOWN BELLY.

[spart5]

Because we were designed to be the 'hero' of the game.

It isn't fair, we're broken, we're overpowered, we have no weaknesses whatsoever. Low magic defense? Use a shield. Low aim? Use a 1h sword, with the shield. No ranged attacks? Don't need them, use Devastate when you're close enough. We have no weaknesses, we have the highest defense, HP and physical strength. Our armor has the highest base defense aswell.

We were designed, as the hero.

Clerics were designed, to heal.

Mages were designed, to damage deal.

Archers were designed, to DOT.

Basic, simple, math. It will never change, no matter how many people in other classes post threads about 'its lyk nut fair u guyzsers!!1one' it will not change, ever.

O realy the "hero" was not desighned so much as u think they are completely weak against the mages they are crushed by them no matter how weak a mages defence is.

Clerics are not only to heal, since when do they work for the fighter...NEVER!!! because its there own skill and with many other replenishing skills there unique ability gives them the uppewr hand to a fighter and a mace is good enough speed,str and accuracy to take down a fighter

An archers role is very good since they do all the strong poisons fast bow attacks and with good precise aim(who needs a sword when u can atk 2 times faster than a sword,2h or axe)

fighters were built to sustain the damage and give enough str while the others can go in and help but from any other based monsters the other clers steps in

[viso-red]

O realy the "hero" was not desighned so much as u think they are completely weak against the mages they are crushed by them no matter how weak a mages defence is.

Clerics are not only to heal, since when do they work for the fighter...NEVER!!! because its there own skill and with many other replenishing skills there unique ability gives them the uppewr hand to a fighter and a mace is good enough speed,str and accuracy to take down a fighter

An archers role is very good since they do all the strong poisons fast bow attacks and with good precise aim(who needs a sword when u can atk 2 times faster than a sword,2h or axe)

fighters were built to sustain the damage and give enough str while the others can go in and help but from any other based monsters the other clers steps in

fail, fail, and u guessed it...FAIL

1. Since when do fighters auto-lose to a mage just because theyre a mage?

2. Who said anything about clerics only healing fighters?..they dont work for fighters or ANY other class...but in a party..will the cleric heal themself who is aiming to take no damage, or the tank who is trying to keep all the damage on him/her?

3. Archers dont attack twice as fast as fighters..if you really ever noticed a fighter..FIGHT u would know that fighters in order to deal damage spam skills..u might also want to check the attack rate on a sword,2h, and axe and compare those to a bow..then comeback and tell me if they attack "2 times faster" even by that standard

You should probably play fighter before u make these crazy assumptions..if you have played fighter and still think this way...u failed as a fighter

[Flyff]

O realy the "hero" was not desighned so much as u think they are completely weak against the mages they are crushed by them no matter how weak a mages defence is.

Clerics are not only to heal, since when do they work for the fighter...NEVER!!! because its there own skill and with many other replenishing skills there unique ability gives them the uppewr hand to a fighter and a mace is good enough speed,str and accuracy to take down a fighter

An archers role is very good since they do all the strong poisons fast bow attacks and with good precise aim(who needs a sword when u can atk 2 times faster than a sword,2h or axe)

fighters were built to sustain the damage and give enough str while the others can go in and help but from any other based monsters the other clers steps in

Yeah yeah I've never seen a fighter lose to another class their level.

[nolifer]

I prefer fighters cause they can take a hit and deal pretty nice damage instantly...

[masteroftheblades]

fighters need to like... have no deva during a 1v1.........

[blazedaces]

fighters need to like... have no deva during a 1v1.........
The most fair thing I've ever heard... EVER...

-blazed

[xavier_swift]

Ok, I'm only a lvl 4x fighter, and I haven'tbeen around as long as most of you, but I'd have to agree that fighters are the funnest class on Fiesta. Here are a list of pros and cons that I've discovered about this class so far:

1. Coolest looking armor, with clerics coming in a close second.

2. Coolest looking weapons (I mean, what's cooler than having a big sword slung over your shoulder? xD)

3. In my opinion, can solo way better than any high lvl Full STR cleric can.

4. Damage....Damage.....DAMAGE!!!


Cons

1. Too much money spent on pots. *** are our pots so expensive if we use them the most next to mages?

2. Weak magic def. C'mon!! We can survive numerous attacks from multiple beast monsters, but get owned by a Magic staff??!!! >_<;;;

3. No dual wielding. It would be so cool to dual two short axes or swords.

[xavier_swift]

O realy the "hero" was not desighned so much as u think they are completely weak against the mages they are crushed by them no matter how weak a mages defence is.

Clerics are not only to heal, since when do they work for the fighter...NEVER!!! because its there own skill and with many other replenishing skills there unique ability gives them the uppewr hand to a fighter and a mace is good enough speed,str and accuracy to take down a fighter

An archers role is very good since they do all the strong poisons fast bow attacks and with good precise aim(who needs a sword when u can atk 2 times faster than a sword,2h or axe)

fighters were built to sustain the damage and give enough str while the others can go in and help but from any other based monsters the other clers steps in


Ok, I've gone up against mages with like 6 buff scrolls on them, at my lvl, who spammed spells like crazy, and I still owned them. You're correct about the cleirc part, but uberly wrong about mages. I find it harder to kill archers on my lvl than mages. Just my opinion though.

[Spankle]

if ur talking pvp, yea fighters are easily the best, but thats not even the main aspect of the game, we spend 99% of our time levelling and in that area I think a full +9ed dd build mage with end gear will kill faster in solo or duo with cleric, in abyss anyway. I think if you know how to play a class to its best potential mages could level faster than fighters imo. yall can disagree its my take on it.

[Blaxcalibur]

if ur talking pvp, yea fighters are easily the best, but thats not even the main aspect of the game, we spend 99% of our time levelling and in that area I think a full +9ed dd build mage with end gear will kill faster in solo or duo with cleric, in abyss anyway. I think if you know how to play a class to its best potential mages could level faster than fighters imo. yall can disagree its my take on it.

yesh...killing a mage with full +9s is haaard for ppl who rely on melee damage

And to the guy that said fighters shouldnt be able to use devastate in pvp..seriously? wats next...cleric shouldnt be able to heal huh?

[Waltz9]

i have a lvl 64 fighter full str and full +9 atm.
i know that a fighter is weak against Mdmg.
Thats why i all my equips are based on spr stats.
i can easily kill lvl 70 mages with my fighter and im using a 1h sword and i am full str.
I dont say i can kill everyone but i deal a lot of dmg with my 1h sword. when i pvp against someone with a 2h sword then i deal more dmg then him.
at the same time i have a lot of sp thx to my spr equips. thx to that i can easily spam skills on players without using to many stones for it :).

for me are these the best stats i found. I know a lot of people like an axe more then a 1h but everyone has his own opinion about this. and this is a discusion that will be resolved.

[drago11]

because fighters get more helth

[fadingsensation]

Fighter is cool, strong, and nice, i soloed all boss by myself, Fighter able to switch 1h and axe in second, *2h is just for the look lmao. "GGK, CG, GOC, and Blue axe ftw."
Hotkey your axe and 1h, i alway use both during aoe, solo, or pvp.... if you know how to time it....xD

Fighter is already strong with just one +9 *as in equiptments.* with all gear +9?.... i don't want to think about that xD.... lvl 80 fighter "9k+HP, 3000+def" uhhh .. back away from him before he kill you xD.

For Battle between classes, if both got all +9 and same lvl , fighter will always win. With clerics,.... eventually fighter win ,but long time though .. if he know how to use his character xD, ...

On AOE, whoever said that clerics and mage kill faster.... i said my fighter aoe way faster solo.... With +9 axe, and end gears that +9.. i pulled like the whole room and spam skill.... 25spr, full str for me. are you talking about silver and gold, soling give me plenty enough to cover with pot and stone.... got more than 40g to spare on that lol xD


but which class is better? it all depend on how you handle your character, for me, my cleric i can pawn a fighter at my lvl any time xD ... lvl 59... Chief Guard best friend... Chief Guard godly hammer +9, full gear with max end and dex\str +9 ...Soler Clerics...

[sonicthehedgehog2]

whoo lets hear it for da fighters, yea!!

[fightingranma]

The fighters are on the top because they are the most important party members.
They have got an axe, a 2-handed sword and a 1-handed sword and a shield.
Why have they got 3 weapons?
Because they can be a tanker or a DD.
The mage cannot be a tanker because he hasnt got much hit points. The archer cannot be a tanker because he attacks from 3m.

[goten10]

I agree with jax.Why dont other classes get 3weps.I bet its because they cant think of any....?


Lvl 35 fighter teva
lvl 13 cleric teva
lvl 65 mage teva

[goten10]

To what blax said if fighter cant us THERE ONLY AOE.Devastate i say mages and archers souldnt be aloud eather

[goten10]

[]


O realy the "hero" was not desighned so much as u think they are completely weak against the mages they are crushed by them no matter how weak a mages defence is.

Clerics are not only to heal, since when do they work for the fighter...NEVER!!! because its there own skill and with many other replenishing skills there unique ability gives them the uppewr hand to a fighter and a mace is good enough speed,str and accuracy to take down a fighter

An archers role is very good since they do all the strong poisons fast bow attacks and with good precise aim(who needs a sword when u can atk 2 times faster than a sword,2h or axe)

fighters were built to sustain the damage and give enough str while the others can go in and help but from any other based monsters the other clers steps in

well there is one thing i saw is the you said mages always win that not true it all comes down to your build and how good of a mage they are in my case i say if a lvl 20 fighter and mage fight fighter would,but if they where lvl 60 i'd say mage because of there AOE