PDA

View Full Version : question about the [2] [3] ..


silverfater
09-15-2007, 09:08 AM
i notice that some skills seems repeated? for example for archers [fury shot] [bone shot] and [venomous shot] they all look the same, apart from the dmg/sec and it's duration ... so why 3 of the same skills when we can just learn one overall? is it to save us empowerment points or save money or what?

also, another thing is the [1] [2] for some skills ... why is further advancement of it? say heal[1] and [2] they both the same except heal[2] heals more? cos it doesn't really say that u pre-require one skill to buy the next .. so wouldn't players waste points on empowering heal[1] when they can purchase heal[2] later on?

Chriszed
09-15-2007, 09:09 AM
They arent the same. You can poisen the enemy 3 times instead of one!

TastyTapioca
09-15-2007, 09:30 AM
i notice that some skills seems repeated? for example for archers [fury shot] [bone shot] and [venomous shot] they all look the same, apart from the dmg/sec and it's duration ... so why 3 of the same skills when we can just learn one overall? is it to save us empowerment points or save money or what?

also, another thing is the [1] [2] for some skills ... why is further advancement of it? say heal[1] and [2] they both the same except heal[2] heals more? cos it doesn't really say that u pre-require one skill to buy the next .. so wouldn't players waste points on empowering heal[1] when they can purchase heal[2] later on?


Hope the following helps simplify you questions.

Essentially, empowering skill points into Heal[1] will carry over into Heal[2] when you purchase and activate it. The empowerment points transfer over into the updated spell, so it is not wasted like you may feel. If you put two points into 1, you'll have two points in 2. They carry over.

93rawr93
09-16-2007, 11:32 AM
if you have all your skills set as hotkeys the minute you use 1 they all have to regen again, so basically its just for mana i guess, incase your healing someone and dont have enough mana for lvl [3] but you do for [1]