Patches and Updates

[aptbid2002]

A show of hands, how many of you would rather have a patch once a month or once a quarter that was a quality patch. A Patch that actually corrected bugs and issues not introduced new ones. I don't think enough testing goes into these patches. Please vote above or leave a reply, thanks.

[jerichoholic77]

once a month would be great, it might give oos some time to test patches so they dont release a flood of bugs every week

[spookyiness]

there is nothing wrong with the current patch situation
are you saying that you wouldn't want a bug fixed for a month if it could be fixed in a week?

[jerichoholic77]

there is nothing wrong with the current patch situation
are you saying that you wouldn't want a bug fixed for a month if it could be fixed in a week?

well heres one thing they can do, the first tuesday of each month can be a patching, then 3 days later on the next friday can be a bugfix :) i hate having maintenances every week it shortens my time to vend

[cercia]

I think, last I remember, that the scheduled patching was biweekly, and routine maintenance was the other weeks.

That being said, the fact that we have picked up two patches in two weeks says they are trying to fix things.

It does seem a little rushed, and I do wish for there to be better quality control. However, I am fine with the (mostly) biweekly schedule thus far.

[Nighthell676]

once a month would be great, it might give oos some time to test patches so they dont release a flood of bugs every week

It would ^^ it'd give OS time to think about wat patch they'll be getting themselves into and how it would work and how different patches would work perfectly