PDA

View Full Version : reverse name for mages o.0?



calibur1015
02-12-2010, 03:50 AM
im not sure about it but i might be o.o.......

it took a bit of thinking ... not really just a sudden hunch.
but isnt warlock a summoning class?
and wizard is the elemental nuking class?

it confuses me why outspark made it like that.

because i just cant really picture a wizard summoning skeletons.

its easier 2 picture a warlock summoning XD.

ok theres that and further more.

wizards should weild wands
have the skills up grades warlocks have now.
y= im not sure... it just fits better?

warlocks should weild staffs
having skills of wizards.
y= warlocks rely on dark mage, aka summoning to do there work,
pure hand nuking doesnt seem like them. id see more summoning work and alot of
debuffing XD. staffs cause u dont need something so heavy to hold as u run. ( yush wands are heavier, they look almost like mace as the lvls progress)


lol idky i posted it, i guess i wanted 2 speak my mind. it was just really confusing and
just stuck out at me. and with a few moveing skills and some reading i managed 2 come
up with whats up there. hmm i hope i didnt miss anything, im very sleepy atm ( 6:49am) should sleep soon ._. .... anyways thanks for reading. looking forward to replys and what others think.

Icetra
02-12-2010, 05:17 AM
That...that actually makes sense.

But I thought Wizards use staffs?

Look at Gandalf. >.>

It's more balance that way, since they're summoning the power of the elements.

Though I agree with Warlocks. They're more sinister. >:

genomax
02-12-2010, 06:27 AM
Warlocks aren't exactly associated with summoning. They specialize in offensive spells which are used in large-scale battles (hence their name), and can be compared to damage dealing mages. Therefore it seems to make more sense that warlocks would focus on their single-target skills, which are devastating and deal lots of damage in one go.

I agree that it doesn't make sense that Wizards summon - summoning always seems too sinister for wizards, but I dunno.

calibur1015
02-12-2010, 12:56 PM
yush o.o but iv never watched lord of the rings. though i have played one game. so im not sure how mages in the movie/game go XD..

but what confuses me more now is what will our next class title be,
will wizards be necromancers?
and warlocks be sorccers?

Icetra
02-13-2010, 02:02 AM
If wizards become necromancers.

I'm going to cry.

They have no need to learn such dark Magic. :>

Exactly. Wizards are more balance with their offensive power. Warlocks go all out on a slaugter fest. O:

I've never really saw a full-fledge wizard summon before. o_o

What about Sages, or Archmages?

calibur1015
02-13-2010, 03:23 AM
i wonder if OS will change it cause of me... proabably not. but i still think it doesnt make sence.


i also ment this possible next class o.o
wizards be sorccers ( still wont make any sence on summoning XD)
warlocks be necromancers( unless we get 2 summon something better then skeletons and MORE the mage title is usless)

idk but i wont pick warlock or wizard till next lvl cap. i all agaisnt the current skills atm. nothing pwns for a warlock >.> like im not going 2 be proud of anything. our own 2 personal skills is mesmerize and metamorphisis. what i think of them is .... a cast and run >.>...... unlike wizards. i love skeletons, great touch. adds so much dmg. blink is a cast and run o.o. but yush. as personal skills. warlocks this year/last year. got nothing o.o. so i hope for more powerful spells. since warlocks are the pvp type class.

but i do like the fact that warlocks get the lvl 100 magic blast :3 i love using that skill *-* pew pew pew!.

anyways sorry for this last message sounding rude, abnoxious, or how ever mean it sounds. its 6:22am. REALLY TIRED , REALLY should be SLEEPING but idky im still up. but im going now, night ^-^ well morning >.>

imeel
02-23-2010, 10:27 PM
idk but i wont pick warlock or wizard till next lvl cap. i all agaisnt the current skills atm. nothing pwns for a warlock >.> like im not going 2 be proud of anything. our own 2 personal skills is mesmerize and metamorphisis. what i think of them is .... a cast and run >.>...... unlike wizards. i love skeletons, great touch. adds so much dmg. blink is a cast and run o.o. but yush. as personal skills. warlocks this year/last year. got nothing o.o. so i hope for more powerful spells. since warlocks are the pvp type class.

but i do like the fact that warlocks get the lvl 100 magic blast :3 i love using that skill *-* pew pew pew!.


Well it looks like ure still 7x o.o; of course dont u think u need to be lvl 100 or already a warlock to think about the skills? x.x

Of course mages need defensive skills, many as can, because the lack of HP and DEF, and yes u need HIT and RUN(kite), unless u wanna die easily. Those skeletons re good for poking low lvl people, but after 95 doesnt deal that much dmg u think. im lvl 105 and the lvl 103 fireball hits very hard, also if u use inferno set teh added m dmg of it is around 6-7k. Meta is very useful to ran if u gonan get ganged in a war, sleep is one of the best skills ever..sleeping their enemy cleric while watch their pt to die because is unable to heal for 20-29 seconds.. o.o;
Wizard have extremely high cd's, and cant be a constat pvp'er, like a warlock is.

asdis
03-09-2010, 11:18 PM
They've been watching to much harry potter ^w^

calibur1015
03-10-2010, 03:21 PM
last harrypotter i watched was book 4, and i watched it in ... when ever it came out o.0.