sinjid9
12-23-2007, 08:37 PM
Which is better Acolyte or Templar. How much Buffs do Templars have? is it a lot less then Acolytes? Which is easier too train? Is the training alot harder then the other one by alot or a little? Which is better in the end?
deronnice
12-23-2007, 08:49 PM
Acolytes are healers. Templars are more soloers.. if you like partying and being the surport class.. choose Acolyte/cleric tree, if you like using buffs on your self and soloing.. choose templar.. its simple
Claiomh.Solais
12-24-2007, 11:34 AM
Please, stop it with the pointless questions about which class is better, anyone who has been on a high enough lvl party knows that indeed every class has a role that no other class could do.
And btw, as was said before, a templar is like a squire that can heal itself but hits somewhat lower damage. I won’t really consider the buffs, as the other classes also have autobuffs to improve their overall capacity, so saying that a templar can buff itself is overall pointless as a point of comparison.
As for training, by the time you hit lvl 45 as acolyte, training in a good party shouldn’t really be much of a problem and indeed that can be a very fast way of training. But then again, being able to solo fast every now and then can also be good, so of the two, the aco trains faster if you can easily get a party of powerful people to train on high lvl areas (that is, you have a buddy list with people willing to party and with varying classes), while the temp can easily go solo if parties are going slow, therefore also having the potential for better exp.